In the post below ("Write a great book"), Doug Riddle asks the question:
So what makes a great book a great book?
Obviously there is a huge subjective component to this. On the other hand, you seldom hear people say that that Shakespeare guy really sucked, or that Raymond Chandler was a hack.
(Naturally, you can find someone who'll say it, but by consensus if nothing else, there are some objective standards of quality. Otherwise, my daughter's scribbling would be on the Times bestseller list.)
In simple terms, I think a great book has what Paul Guyot calls "the combo plate." (I love that term because it makes me think of Mexican food. And I love Mexican food.)
The combo plate means the book has a great story told through great prose. You'll find a lot of good books that have one or the other, but when you put the two together, that's when you approach greatness.
Some combination of the components that make a great book, if not all of them, will be present: interesting, multi-faceted characters; a dynamite protagonist; a worthy antagonist (if there is one); a plot that draws you in; an original story (or, at least, an original take on a familiar story) that holds your interest throughout the book; a compelling authorial voice; rich conflict; dialogue that sparkles; evocative descriptions; a setting that comes alive...
What do you think? You know a great book when you read it -- so what makes it great?
For me personally, the aspects I like most are:
*dynamite protagonist
*original story that holds your interest
*rich conflict
*dialogue that sparkles
Obviously I like them all, but those 4 really seem to stand out for me.
Posted by: David Montgomery | March 27, 2008 at 05:04 PM
I think a big part of writing a great book is writing the best book that you, and only you, can write, and that means finding your own voice. Look at most standout crime novels of the past decade and you'll be hard-pressed to say that the basic story (murder, kidnapping, heist) or underlying themes (betrayal, revenge, redemption) are wholly original, but a fresh voice, a new take on character archetypes, and crackling dialogue can make all the difference between a familiar story and a great novel.
Posted by: Tim Maleeny | March 27, 2008 at 07:51 PM
Great point. I attended a workshop that David Morrell gave a couple years ago and one of the things he advised was, "Write the book that only you can write. Don't try to copy somebody else. Be a first-rate version of yourself, not a second-rate version of another writer."
Great advice.
Posted by: David J. Montgomery | March 27, 2008 at 08:07 PM
The problem with the question is that one person's great book is another's unreadable.
I don't think there is a universal great book.
I think that David Morrell's advice is great - I'd add to it you should decide to write the book out of burning desire to live in that world and explore that theme and know those people.
I don't know this for sure but I would bet that there has never been a great book that was written without passion pushing the pen.
Posted by: M.J | March 27, 2008 at 08:25 PM
Lately I've enjoyed books more if they have more ideas in them, if they try and dig a little deeper into the 'why' of things.
Then they have to have all that character and story stuff...
Posted by: John McFetridge | March 27, 2008 at 08:32 PM
The "write the best book you can" line is a given. It is also as much a cop out as an author answering "read, read, read," when asked for advice for begining authors. You become a better writer by writing. When you were learning to read in elementary school no one told you "write, write, write," it will make you a better reader. The fact that you read should also be a given.
And why would anyone think for a minute you would not write the best novel you can before submitting it?
When Michael Connelly submitted The Black Ice (in MY OPINION one of the best novels written, and not just crime novels) he was submitting the best book he could write.
When Dan Brown submitted The Da Vinci Code (a good idea in search of a more skilled writer, again MY OPINION) he was submitting the best book he could write.
The BIGGEST difference (and there are many differences) between these two books is CHARACTER.
CHARACTER = a "dynamite protagonist" that we care about, who presents the world to us from an interesting viewpoint, which means it may be an old story, but we are seeing it from his unique perspective. And how does he convey this to us...through dialogue and how he handles conflict.
I will wade through a less then inspired plot if the character is interesting.
Funny you should mention Raymond Chandler. His novel The Long Goodbye is my favorite novel of all time. Now was Chandler a great plotter/storyteller? Not by a long shot. But I will gladly give up an evening anytime to hear Marlowe's take on the world.
So CHARACTER is it for me....I know there are going to be people who don't argee. But this is what makes a great book for me.
Posted by: Doug Riddle | March 27, 2008 at 10:00 PM
According to my own exploration, billions of persons in the world get the credit loans at well known banks. Therefore, there's a good possibility to receive a car loan in every country.
Posted by: ConsueloGOULD26 | March 20, 2010 at 01:20 PM
I got your book today, and it looks great! I really liked the suggestions in the first chapter it makes me feel better about my recent failed ufo (not to worry its going to look great on my mom). Anyway, I can't wait to cast on my first project! Congrats!!
http://www.buyonline-rx.com/ed.html
http://www.buyonline-rx.com/sitemap.html
Posted by: Impotence causes | October 01, 2010 at 11:27 AM
When you are talking about books you'll always find people who talk bad about it even if those are great books but It is something that the actor has to manage very well because if you get influence for that you won't be successful.
Posted by: Viagra Online | November 05, 2010 at 02:12 PM
I've always thought the most important to consider a great books as a great one is its content and how the author transmit his/her emotions and different feelings. This is not easy, but if the author wanna be renowned across all the world, he/she should try to achieve this requirement.
Posted by: Soft Cialis | November 05, 2010 at 04:58 PM
You are right. It is very subjective. But it has to compel a large audience. Some books can have those two things but they don't sell well. Because they aren't target to large audience.
Posted by: Viagra Online | November 08, 2010 at 09:35 AM
Noir Nation is looking for writers, stories, and graphic novels in category crime/noir.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0MlSe6zU-k
More info: [email protected]
Posted by: Mr THomas Alan Thomas | June 02, 2011 at 07:47 AM